|
Books
and Edited Volumes
- Oreskes, Naomi,
The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American
Earth Science, Oxford University Press, 1999.
- Oreskes, Naomi
and James R. Fleming, eds. 2000. “Perspectives on Geophysics,”
Special Issue of Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
31B, September 2000.
- Oreskes, Naomi,
ed., with Homer E. Le Grand, 2001. Plate Tectonics: An Insider’s
History of the Modern Theory of the Earth (Boulder: Westview Press),
paperback edition February 2003. [Named by Library Journal as one of
the “Best Science and Technology Books of 2002,” and Choice
Magazine Outstanding Academic Titles, 2003, and adopted as a core text
by ERESE: Enduring Resources for Earth Science Education (http://earthref.org/ERESE).
- Oreskes, Naomi,
in prep. Science on a Mission: American Oceanography in the Cold War
and Beyond, under contract to University of Chicago Press, expected
submission Summer/Fall 2006.
Book
Chapters
- Oreskes, Naomi,
1997. “Testing models of natural systems: Can it be done?,”
in Structures and Norms in Science: Volume Two of the Tenth International
Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, edited by
M.L. Chiara et al. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997) pp. 207-217.
- Oreskes, Naomi,
2000. “Why predict? Historical perspectives on prediction in the
earth sciences,” in Prediction: Decision-making and the Future
of Nature, edited by Daniel Sarewitz, Roger Pielke, Jr., and Radford
Byerly, Jr. (Washington, D.C.: Island Press), pp. 23-40.
Reprinted as Oreskes, Naomi, 2003. “The changing role of prediction
in the earth sciences,” in History and Philosophy of Science for
African Undergraduates, edited by Helen Lauer (Ibadan, Nigeria: Hope
Publications), pp. 358-368.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2000. “Why believe a computer? Models, measures, and meaning
in the natural world,” in The Earth Around Us: Maintaining a Livable
Planet, edited by Jill S. Schneiderman (San Francisco: W.H. Freeman
and Co.), pp. 70-82.
- Oreskes,
Naomi and Kenneth Belitz, 2001. “Philosophical Issues in Model
Assessment,” in Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological
Science, edited by M.G. Anderson and P.D. Bates (London: John Wiley
and Sons, Ltd.), pp. 23-41.
- Oreskes, Naomi,
2002. “Gravity surveys in the ‘permanent’ ocean basins:
An instrumental chink in a theoretical suit of armor,” in Oceanographic
History: The Pacific and Beyond, edited by Keith R. Benson and Philip
F. Rehbock (Seattle: University of Washington Press), pp. 502-510.
- Oreskes, Naomi
and Ronald E. Doel, 2002. “Physics and chemistry of the earth,”
in The Cambridge History of Science, Volume V: Modern Physical and Mathematical
Sciences, edited by Mary Jo Nye, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press),
538-552.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2003. “The role of quantitative models in science,”
in Models in Ecosystem Science, edited by Charles D. Canham, Jonathan
J. Cole, and William K. Lauenroth (Princeton: Princeton University Press),
pp. 13-31.
- Munk,
Walter, Naomi Oreskes, and Richard Muller, 2004. “Gordon J.F.
MacDonald,” National Academy of Sciences Biographical Memoirs
84: 3-26.
- Oreskes, Naomi,
in press., “From scaling to simulation: Changing meanings and
ambitions of models in the Earth sciences,” accepted for publication,
in Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, and Exemplary Narratives,
edited by Angela N.H. Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise,
Duke University Press.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, in press, “The scientific consensus on climate change:
How do we know we’re not wrong?” to appear in Climate Change,
Joseph F. C. DiMento and Pamela Doughman eds., under contract to MIT
Press.
- Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik
Conway, in review, “Deny, Deny, Deny: How to Sow Confusion about
Climate Change,” Agnotology: The Social Production of Ignorance,
edited by Robert Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, under consideration
at Stanford University Press.
Selected
Papers and Essays (Science Studies)
Oreskes,
Naomi, Kristin Shrader-Frechette and Kenneth Belitz, 1994. “Verification,
validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences,”
Science, vol. 263, pp. 641-646. [Reprinted in Transactions
of the Computer Measurement Group, vol. 84, pp. 85-92].
Oreskes,
Naomi, 1996. “Objectivity or heroism? On the invisibility of women
in science,” OSIRIS, vol. 11, pp. 87-113. [Winner of 1997
Forum for the History of Science in America Best Paper Prize and the 2000
History of Science Society Women in Science Prize]
Oreskes,
Naomi, 1998. “Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models,
Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 106, supp. 6, pp. 1453-1460.
Oreskes, Naomi
and Ronald Rainger, 2000. “Science and security before the atomic
bomb: The loyalty case of Harald U. Sverdrup,” Studies in
the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, vol. 31B, pp. 309-369.
Oreskes, Naomi,
2000. “Why predict? Historical perspectives on prediction in the
earth sciences,” in Prediction: Decision-making and the Future
of Nature, edited by Daniel Sarewitz, Roger Pielke, Jr., and Radford
Byerly, Jr. (Washington, D.C.: Island Press), pp. 23-40.
Oreskes, Naomi
and Ronald E. Doel, 2002. “Physics and chemistry of the earth,”
in The Cambridge History of Science, Volume V: Modern Physical
and Mathematical Sciences, edited by Mary Jo Nye (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press) 538-552.
Oreskes, Naomi
and James R. Fleming, 2000. “Why Geophysics?” Studies in
the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31B: 253-257.
Oreskes, Naomi,
2000. “Laissez-tomber? Women’s work and military patronage
in twentieth century oceanography,” Historical Studies in the
Physical and Biological Sciences 30: 373-392.
Oreskes, Naomi,
2001. “Getting oceanography done,” Earth Sciences History
19: 37-43.
Oreskes,
Naomi, 2003. “A context of motivation: U.S. Navy oceanographic research
and the discovery of sea-floor hydrothermal vents,” Social Studies
of Science 33 (5): 697-742.
Oreskes,
Naomi, 2004. “Science and public policy: What’s proof got
to do with it?,” Environmental Science and Policy 7 (5): 369-383.
Oreskes,
Naomi, 2004. “The scientific consensus on climate change,”
Science 306: 1686. Reprinted in Newsletter of Physicians for Social Responsibility,
December 2004.
Top
of Page
Selected
Papers and Essays (Earth Science)
- Oreskes, Naomi
and Einaudi, M.T., 1990. “Origin of LREE-enriched hematite breccias
at the Olympic Dam, Cu-U-Au-Ag deposit, Roxby Downs, South Australia,”
Economic Geology, vol. 85, no. 1, p. 1-28.
- Oreskes, Naomi
and Einaudi, M.T., 1992. “Origin of hydrothermal fluids at Olympic
Dam: Preliminary results from fluid inclusions and stable isotopes,”
Economic Geology, vol. 87, no. 1, p. 64-90.
- Hitzman, M.W.,
Oreskes, Naomi, and Einaudi, M.T., 1992. “Geologic characteristics
and tectonic setting of Proterozoic Fe-REE deposits,” Precambrian
Research, vol. 58, p. 241-287.
- Rhodes, A.L., Oreskes,
Naomi, and Sheets, Sossity, 1999. “Geology and REE geochemistry
of the magnetite deposits at El Laco, Chile.” Economic Geology
Special Publication No. 7: Geology and Ore Deposits of the Central
Andes, pp. 299-332.
- Rhodes, A.L., and
Oreskes, Naomi, 1999. “Oxygen isotope composition of magnetite
deposits at El Laco, Chile: Evidence of formation from isotopically
heavy fluids,” Economic Geology Special Publication No.
7: Geology and Ore Deposits of the Central Andes, pp. 333-351.
Book
Reviews, Encyclopedia Article and miscellany (excluding abstracts)
- Oreskes,
Naomi 2002. “Continental Drift,” Encyclopedia of Global
Environmental Change, edited by Michael C. MacCracken and John S. Perry
(Chichester: John Wiley and Sons), 321-325.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2003. “Stepping Forward Too Far? [Review of ‘Prematurity
in Scientific Discovery, edited by Ernest B. Hook]. Science 300: 1094-1095,
and Reply
to Discussion of Prematurity in Science by Hook, Science 301: 1045-1046.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2004. “Shaking Up Seismology” [Review of The Big
One by Jake Page and Charles Officer, Nature 431:1038.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2004. “A Call for a Collective” [Review of Politics
of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy by Bruno Latour],
Science 305: 1241-1242.
- Oreskes,
Naomi, 2005. “Anti-realism in government” [Review of The
Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney], Science 310 (7 October 2005):
56.
Popular
Articles/Op-Ed
Top
of Page
|
|